Filed under: Bad cartooning, Evil Photoshop | Tags: bad photoshop, Bok, greenberg, stantis, Thompson
Here’s another look at who’s discovered crayons and who has spent more time using their adobe mojo rather than coming up with an idea that floats.
This weeks “Look Ma, I did it all by myself” award goes to Scott Stantis for this series of cartoons.
AUGH! My eyes! Scott, just because the press prints in CMYK doesn’t mean that those are the only colors you can use. Try something a little more subtle like, oh I don’t know, sky-blue? You know, the color that you actually see when you look up. What you have there is a serious abuse of the gradient tool. Watch out or you might get your photoshop rights revoked. The mail, on the other hand, is spot on. Everything I get in my mailb0x is banana yellow. My text bubbles are always urine-colored too.
I feel like Scott’s patriotism is spilling over into his job. His insatiable need to label everything lead him to show that both the hat and the mailbox are true Americans.
By the way, the press-room called. They ran out of cyan before they got half-way through with your cartoon.
Snore…… Oh, sorry, where was I? Oh looky, cyan and yellow! That, by the way, is a very original idea. Two people watching TV. I’ll have to try that someday.
Ug. Cartoonists need to stop crying about their jobs when all they can come up with is a weeping logo. I know he’s busy doing two other garishly self-righteous cartoons but, come on, he traced a logo, drew a tear-drop and put his signature on it. Whoop-dee. His readers dropped 10 IQ points just by looking at this cartoon. And, if you look hard enough, I think it has cyan in it and today I really hate cyan.
Let’s look at some other cartoons. Chip Bok gets the ‘Coloring is hard work’ award.
I know that cross-hatching is time consuming but we should be used to the repetitive motion from patting ourselves on the back all day. Apparently, Chip wanted to do a color cartoon but only got half-way through when he found out that there was a world-wide shortage of cyan. Thanks a lot, Scott. Now poor Chip looks like he was just lazy.
Just wanted to point something out. Steve Greenberg did exactly zero drawing in this cartoon. It’s all type, Benjamins and a bad gradient. He get’s the ‘photoshop can fix anything’ award for this one. When I first saw this I thought, “Huh. Is that supposed to be a black hole?” Luckily, Steve was kind enough to spell it out for us because his cartoon wasn’t able to do so. See where it says ‘black hole’? That means one of two things:
Option A: The cartoonist assumes that the reader is too stupid to understand.
Option B: The cartoonist knows that no one will get this stupid cartoon.
This cartoon died in photoshop when the cartoonist realised he didn’t have the ability to convey his idea visually. His photohop kung-fu was just not strong enough. Mike Thompson, the Ivan Drago of CS2, has one answer for such weakness.
Yup, a brick wall.
At least he didn’t use cyan.
9 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>






I like this cartoon.
Comment by Hugh Jass March 1, 2008 @ 12:42 amMike Thompson and his brick wall again is pretty funny. But he does it well here. It looks good and the cartoon itself is pretty funny.
Comment by Furious Diaper March 1, 2008 @ 1:40 amNader-as-republican-enabler was a concept that got old when michael moore complained about it following the gore/bush race, and i’m sure it was well-worn by the time he got published.
i also like how the office is only big enough to fit a desk, and has no visible doors. it looks like Nader is sitting in a department store window…
…or is that a layer of symbolism i’m missing?
Comment by matt hyland March 1, 2008 @ 2:31 amJoe Conason takes the Republican enabler theme to new levels at Salon.
The Nader office in this toon does have a weird outdoor mall feel to it. Like one of those high end shopping villages that attempts to look like a quaint little town. I have no idea what that actually has to do with Nader, however.
Comment by Kevin Moore March 1, 2008 @ 2:44 am“Nader-as-republican-enabler was a concept that got old when michael moore complained about it following the gore/bush race, and i’m sure it was well-worn by the time he got published.”
That sounds like a complaint about Nader, not Thompson… unless this cartoon has been done dozens of times before.
Comment by Furious Diaper March 1, 2008 @ 2:44 amI meant that the concept is not particularly novel. It’s not as well-worn as some of the examples BC has highlighted, though.
Every third party candidate I’ve seen gain momentum is satirized in a similar manner. Not that Nader has had any momentum since 2000, but that makes my point even more. his campaign is a joke as-is, no satire necessary.
There was lots of similar talk when Ron Paul was rumored to be running as a libertarian, too.
Comment by matt hyland March 1, 2008 @ 8:07 amYAWN … Huh? Oh, you’ve posted another bitch rant?
In less than one week, this blog has gone from the most interesting to the most pathetic. You’ve made some interesting points, but at THIS point, I think I’ll put your bookmark in the archives.
I don’t care who you are. If you think you can do better than your targets … DO IT!
If not, nice knowing ya.
Comment by Bored Cartoonist March 1, 2008 @ 10:01 pmMy only issue with the Thompson cartoon is he could have blown it up about 10% and gotten rid of the dead space where the door is.
I agree that I don’t get why Bok would only color half the cartoon.
Lets just face it, many established edit cartoonists don’t know what to do with color. I’d guess – by the missed areas behind the chair and int he cross hatching – that Stantis is learning on the job.
Comment by Philip Shade March 4, 2008 @ 4:16 pmWTF is the joke with Bok cartoon? If the point is that Obama doesn’t say original great things, fine, but “Yes we can” not original to Obama either, it’s Ceasar Chavez’s slogan and therefore should be in the first panel with “I have a dream” etc. Does Bok seriously not know this?
Comment by Anonymous March 5, 2008 @ 1:14 am