The bad cartoonist


How to be an Editorial Cartoonist with really trying
February 28, 2008, 11:08 pm
Filed under: How to be an Editorial Cartoonist | Tags: ,

Todays lesson is a follow-up on yesterdays lesson on how you too can be a cartoonist with out really trying.  Today we’re going to learn from one well-paid, syndicate, award-winning cartoonist; Jeff Stahler. 

Yesterday we learned how you can rip off Hollywood or Cnn when realise you don’t have a creative bone in your body.  For those of you who are so insipid that you can’t even make a cartoon out of a movie poster we have the following technique.  We’re going to call it the ‘Stahler’ because he does it more than anybody else but, keep in mind, every cartoonist on the planet does this, repeatedly.  And they all hate it with a passion.

 The idea is simple.  If you can’t come up with an idea about a news story, just draw a cartoon of people reacting to the news.  Most often this cartoon will be of two people, husband and wife, sipping coffee at the breakfast table reacting the newspaper in their hands.  The cartoonist must draw the newspaper.  No one knows for sure why, but it is a rule that is followed religiously.  Subtle variations include:  two people at a cafe; two people in front of the TV (in this instance the cartoonist must draw the remote control.  Don’t ask why, just do it.  It’s a rule.);  two people reading a sign and so forth. 

 This approach forgoes any deep thinking that one would have to do to come up with something creative like, oh I don’t know, an actual metaphor.  All one has to do is recreate his breakfast and call it a day!

All of these cartoons were done by Jeff Stahler within the past month.  Our first cartoon is a perfect example of the ‘Stahler’.  Take note of the easy to read headline for the reader who is, presumably, totally ignorant of recent news.  Also note the coffee mug and the striking resemblance that the male figure bears to the cartoonist.  He was so lazy that day he didn’t even bother to make up a stranger; he just drew himself.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

Subtle variations on the ‘Stahler’ are below.  There’s little thinking going on, just two people making a funny.  There is no remote control in this cartoon but the man is holding a bowl of popcorn which is a substitution that is allowed as long as it is not a repeat offender.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

There he is again!  That’s the cartoonist in his own cartoon reacting to the show he watched with his wife the night before.  Something tells me that SHE is the one who came up with the idea.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

He’s really mixing it up in this one.  We have both a TV and a newspaper.  This newspaper serves the purpose of telling the reader what the joke is about because the cartoonist hasn’t thought of another way to do it.  Soon cartoonist will resort to small captions that explain the purpose and punchline of a joke so that no thought is required on the part of the reader.  Oh, wait.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

Bigger TV, same cartoon.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

This last one is a doozy.  If you think this is a familiar cartoon, intrepid reader, you just might be right.  It bears a striking resemblance to the first cartoon in this post.  That’s right if you get desperate enough, you can do a ‘Stahler’ and plagiarise yourself.

Jeff Stahler hit a brick wall

I’ve overlaid the two cartoons so we can have a comparison (the red lines are the first cartoon, blue lines are the second).  It appears that most of the cartoon was simply redrawn, so at least he didn’t trace himself, but the lines on his wife look suspicious.  In either case, he was so short on ideas he took a cartoon that he did LESS THAN A MONTH AGO, changed the text and clocked in for a full days work.  What?  Has drawing yourself become too time consuming that you have to borrow a cartoon from yourself?  Most cartoonists wait at least a quarter before they start to rehash their old ideas, but one month is pushing it.  At least he remembered the mug

Jeff Stahler plagiarised himself

Well, dear reader, I hope this has been informative.  For those of you who can’t draw, just focus on practicing a few things.  Draw yourself, a mug, a newspaper, a TV and your significant other and you too can be a successful cartoonist!


16 Comments so far
Leave a comment

At least Jeff Stahler has the balls to sign his commentary and not hide behind anonymity.

Comment by Bad Cartoonist Blog February 29, 2008 @ 12:32 am

Hey Einstein, Why the hell would you post an anonymous comment criticizing anonymity? Are you irony-impaired?
Nick Anderson
Dreadful Cartoonist

Comment by Nick Anderson February 29, 2008 @ 5:02 am

Dear Albert Einstein,

I disagree with your methods, but your criticism is completely valid. Ennui on the part of the present-day cartoonist is going to further discredit the field. Think of the children!

Comment by thecomiconline February 29, 2008 @ 6:25 pm

“Einstein” (the first comment) is not the “Bad Cartoonist”. It’s an anonymous swipe at the Bad Cartoonist for being anonymous. It says “Comment by Bad Cartoonist Blog,” I suspect, when someone posts without leaving a name. The same comment has been posted on several other threads. Mr. Bad Cartoonist, you need to fix this glitch…it IS a little confusing at first glance.

Comment by Nick Anderson February 29, 2008 @ 6:36 pm

That’s hilarious. Note also that the people watching tv/reading the newspaper are white middle class straight people. Apparently black, poor and gay people don’t pay attention to the news. Or maybe they pay attention to more important things than fly-by-night scandals - like say, their pressing existential needs.

BTW - stay anonymous. I don’t need to know who you are.

Comment by Kevin Moore February 29, 2008 @ 6:56 pm

Thanks for the note Nick. I’ll see if I can remedy that.

Love the toons BTW.

Comment by badcartoonist February 29, 2008 @ 9:56 pm

“Thanks for the note Nick. I’ll see if I can remedy that.

Love the toons BTW.”

Why does that sound ominous when you say it?

Comment by Nick Anderson February 29, 2008 @ 11:41 pm

Hah! No, I actually meant it. Do you put your kids names in the animations too? I have always thought that was a great idea. Too bad I don’t have any kids named Nina.

Comment by badcartoonist February 29, 2008 @ 11:50 pm

Kevin,

How do you know they’re straight? It could be a gay guy and woman living together. Draw anything but vanilla people and people might think you’re saying something that you’re not. Black guy watching football: what? Black people don’t watch the news? They only eat popcorn and watch sports? RACIST!

Comment by Furious Diaper March 1, 2008 @ 1:57 am

“Furious Diaper” would make a great band name. Or webcomic strip title.

Comment by Kevin Moore March 1, 2008 @ 2:38 am

I never realized how bitchy editorial cartoonists are. Amazing

Comment by just a guy March 3, 2008 @ 4:23 am

[...] laziness, hackery, and lack of imagination that characterizes most political cartooning nowadays. For instance: Todays lesson is a follow-up on yesterdays lesson on how you too can be a cartoonist with out [...]

Pingback by Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » Bad Cartoonist! March 4, 2008 @ 7:28 am

Who’s “people”, FDM? And if a cartoonist has a record of drawing a diverse array of people in varied situations, they won’t run into that problem if “people” see the rest of their work. However, if they only depict “non-vanilla” folks in stereotypical circumstances — or employ blatant stereotypes — that’s when they run into trouble, and rightly so.

Comment by Dana March 4, 2008 @ 4:36 pm

Cartoonists need to draw more diverse cartoons. We may be a bunch of white guys but the rest of the country isn’t. You would not know that by looking at the majority of cartoonists work.

Comment by badcartoonist March 4, 2008 @ 11:47 pm

[...] laziness, hackery, and lack of imagination that characterizes most political cartooning nowadays. For instance: Todays lesson is a follow-up on yesterdays lesson on how you too can be a cartoonist with out [...]

Pingback by Bad Cartoonist! | Political Cartoons March 11, 2008 @ 10:35 am

You want to see more examples of this type of stuff, look at Rogers at the pitt post. He runs two people talking every week… er… weak. look and see. it’s shameful… and not funny

Comment by Just a guy April 18, 2008 @ 11:18 am



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>